Generative AI (GenAI) Policy
1. Policy Statement
A‑JMRHS permits the transparent, ethical use of generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude) and AI-assisted technologies in manuscript preparation, following COPE, ICMJE, and WAME guidelines. Authors remain fully accountable for all content accuracy, originality, and integrity.
2. Prohibited Uses
GenAI cannot:
- Be listed as an author or co-author (lacks legal standing, accountability, or conceptual contribution).
- Generate core research content (hypotheses, methods, results, conclusions, data analysis).
- Create fabricated data, images, citations, or references.
- Replace human oversight in ethical judgments or scientific interpretation.
3. Permitted Uses (with Disclosure)
GenAI may assist with:
- Language editing (grammar, clarity for non-native speakers).
- Literature summarization (preliminary idea generation).
- Figure polishing (non-data visualization formatting).
- Reference formatting (style consistency).
All permitted uses require mandatory disclosure in the manuscript.
4. Mandatory Disclosure Requirements
Authors must disclose GenAI use in two locations:
Methods/Acknowledgments Section:
text
"This work utilized [specific GenAI tool, e.g., ChatGPT-4o, version date] for [exact purpose: language polishing, figure formatting]. Authors take full responsibility for content accuracy and originality."
Submission Checklist:
☐ GenAI tools used: [Tool name/version] | ☐ Purpose: [Language editing/Idea generation/Other] | ☐ Impact on conclusions: [None/Minor/Major]
5. Peer Review and Editorial Use
- Reviewers/Editors disclosing GenAI use in reviews must note it confidentially to editors.
- GenAI-generated reviewer comments are not permitted for decision-making.
6. Consequences of Non-Compliance
|
Violation |
Action |
|
Undisclosed use |
Rejection; 12-month submission ban |
|
Prohibited use (data fabrication) |
Retraction; institutional reporting |
|
AI listed as author |
Immediate rejection; blacklisting |
|
Hallucinated citations |
Correction/retraction |
7. Transparency in Published Work
Published articles must include GenAI disclosure in the final version:
text
Acknowledgments: "GenAI tools (ChatGPT-4) assisted language editing. Authors verify all content."
8. Policy Compliance
This policy aligns with:
- COPE Position Statement on AI Authorship (2023).
- Elsevier/Springer/SAGE GenAI guidelines.
- Scopus/Web of Science transparency requirements.
- ICMJE ethical authorship standards.
Effective: 01-01-2025
Contact: editorajmrhs@gmail.com











