ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INTRAOPERATIVE GOAL-DIRECTED FLUID THERAPY AND SURGICAL SITE INFECTION RATES IN GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY

Authors

  • Dr. Sunil M. Chaudhary Medical Officer Class 2 (MBBS), GMERS Medical College & Hospital, Vadnagar, Gujarat, India. Author
  • Dr. Dipakkumar L. Gamot Medical Officer Class 2 (MBBS), GMERS Medical College & Hospital, Vadnagar, Gujarat, India. Author
  • Dr. Shankar S. Chaudhary Medical Officer Class 2 (MBBS), Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat, India. Author

Keywords:

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy, Surgical Site Infection, Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haemodynamic Monitoring, Stroke Volume, Perioperative Care.

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is still a common complication of gastrointestinal surgery. Wound healing can be affected by tissue hypoperfusion, fluid overload, vasoconstriction, oedema and impaired oxygen delivery. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the use of goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) and 30-day SSI following elective gastrointestinal surgery. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 312 adults who were undergoing elective gastrointestinal surgery. Patients treated with stroke-volume guided intraoperative GDFT (n=154) were compared to patients who received conventional fluid therapy (n=158). Dynamic haemodynamic monitoring with crystalloid bolus was only performed if stroke volume rose by at least 10% following a fluid challenge, and vasopressors were used to maintain mean arterial pressure. The primary outcome was CDC-defined SSI within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were total complications, anastomotic leak, postoperative ileus, acute kidney injury, lactate clearance, length of stay, and readmission. Results: Baseline characteristics, diabetes, smoking, albumin, surgical wound class and procedure complexity were similar between the groups. The GDFT group received less crystalloid (2.1 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.2 +/- 1.1 L, p<0.001), had lower net fluid balance (1.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 2.5 +/- 1.2 L, p<0.001), and better end-of-surgery lactate levels (1.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.1 +/- 0.8 mmol/L, p<0.001). The incidence of SSI was 16 patients (10.4%) in the GDFT group and 32 patients (20.3%) in the conventional group (p=0.016). BMI, smoking, albumin, wound class, operative duration, blood loss, and laparoscopic approach were independently associated with the risk of SSI, but GDFT was not.BMI, smoking, albumin, wound class, operative duration, blood loss, and laparoscopic approach were independently associated with the risk of SSI, but GDFT was not. Conclusions: Intraoperative GDFT was correlated with decreased SSI following gastrointestinal surgery, possibly because of the increased perfusion and prevention of fluid overload. Randomized implementation studies are indicated.

Downloads

Published

24-06-2026

How to Cite

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INTRAOPERATIVE GOAL-DIRECTED FLUID THERAPY AND SURGICAL SITE INFECTION RATES IN GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY. (2026). Asian Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences, 4(2), 1102-1106. https://www.ajmrhs.com/journal/article/view/560

Similar Articles

11-20 of 290

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.